LinkedIn's groups provide the potential for informal communities that can pose a challenge to membership organisations.
What is the best way to respond to this challenge and how can membership organisations give their members the experience they expect?
In a previous post I looked at the pros and cons of having your own forum vs LinkedIn. Forums are only part of the story. The wider picture is that LinkedIn and other social networks and online communities run by media companies are a challenge to the future of membership organisations. A number of the issues are those highlighted in the NCVO future of membership report including the availability of the social web, free information and changing expectations on participation. I'll focus on LinkedIn below, but the points are equally relevant across other competing organisations.
LinkedIn's advantages are:
Membership organisations' advantages are in different areas:
My conclusion is that membership organisations need to clearly delineate themselves from LinkedIn (and others) by offering knowledge, learning and service. Part of this is likely to be offering discussion forums which compete on quality rather than quantity. It is important to understand what members and potential members want and will be willing to pay for through membership fees. Many will be willing to pay if they see value.
Further to my previous post "Mobile web, mobile apps and mobile commerce", web usability expert Jakob Nielsen predicts today that mobile web will become preferred over apps in the long term.
Comments
Post new comment